May 5, 2026
DFG's Take on the Adoption of Summerhouse Roads
Let’s revisit a big question and the claim being made by our resident Councilman that he “would absolutely support bridging a conversation” to turn over Summerhouse (SH) roads to Holly Ridge (HR). The question is: Can we stay gated, keep our setup, and have HR adopt our roads? Obviously, that is a BIG deal, so if HR has an option, we are listening. Our advice: Please complete it before the HOA pays for the upcoming repairs. Could you explain why it has taken this long? As a resident on the town council, you have not offered this until now, with de-annexation in the conversation. Could you clarify why? And publicly proclaim it won’t be followed by a corresponding tax increase.
Because once you move past the soundbite and into reality, the answer gets a lot less convenient. Our research and interviews indicate that when municipalities receive Powell Bill (gas tax revenue) funds to take over roads, they must make those roads fully public, not sort of public, not selectively public. That means they must be built or upgraded to current standards set by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), legally dedicated to the public, opened to unrestricted access (yes, that means the gate goes), and then accepted by the town, which, even after doing all these things, is still entirely optional on their part. (Cont'd)
“Meeting NCDOT standards” is not a fresh coat of asphalt; it’s a full engineering requirement. We’re talking proper multi-layer road structure built for long-term durability, lane widths and turning radii that accommodate emergency vehicles, dedicated right-of-way corridors often 50–60 feet wide, engineered drainage systems that prevent long-term damage, connectivity to the broader public network, and full inspection with certified “as-built” documentation. Do you think our developer did this 20 years ago, or do SH roads currently meet these requirements? In case you are wondering, the majority don’t, based on what we can see, and we are guessing more don’t beneath the surface. Translation: this is an expensive, major reconstruction project, not routine maintenance. More so than the maintenance itself.
That’s why the messaging matters. Some council comments suggest “this can be done,” while the mayor has been clear in emails to us that roads must meet NCDOT standards first. Those are not the same statement—one is optimistic, the other is the actual requirement. Since this is being raised in response to our effort, could this be a red herring? (Cont'd)
Summerhouse is approaching 20 years as a community. Our amenities are seeing heavier use, and wear and tear are increasing. With 33% more homes coming, that demand will only grow. At the same time, inflation is driving up the cost of labor, materials, and services.
So what does that mean? Things will need to be repaired. Replaced. Upgraded. And those costs will be borne by us—through higher HOA dues or special assessments. We’ve built a beautiful, self-funded community—and our HOA dollars are clearly at work. The question is: do you feel the same return from your property taxes?
Property taxes are meant to support services tied to your property. The majority of our services are provided by the county, funded by county property taxes, HOA-funded, duplicative for law enforcement, or privately funded by residents. When that connection weakens, so does the value.
De-annexation offers a simple path forward:
Keep the services—while redirecting those tax dollars toward what actually benefits this community. Apply savings to improve your home, strengthen the neighborhood, give to causes you believe in—by choice.
It’s your money. You decide.
Then there’s the gate issue, which isn’t really an issue at all, because our interpretation is that the rule is simple: public roads cannot be gated. If someone in HR knows otherwise, please let us know. If roads are adopted, the law is clear, the gate comes down, access becomes unrestricted, and the roads function like any other public street. The idea that we can keep the gate and maintain control while still getting public maintenance doesn’t hold up.
The same holds true for golf carts. Right now, usage feels simple because the roads are private and governed by HOA rules. Once roads go public, golf carts fall under state and municipal regulations—potentially restricting where they can operate, adding requirements for street legality, enforcement, or even limitations that don’t exist today.
And none of this comes free. To even be considered, roads would likely require significant upgrades paid for upfront by the HOA, followed by a request that the town is not obligated to approve. So the real plan is: spend heavily, give up control, accept new rules, and HOPE for approval.
There’s nothing wrong with exploring options, but HR presenting this as easy—or even likely—is misleading and ironically convenient. If someone says “it can be done,” the real questions are: under what conditions, at what cost, and with what trade-offs?
Feel free to speak with some of our neighbors in the Villages of Folkstone. They can verify how their quest to have HR take over their roads went, and they are not even gated. Spoiler alert - Villages of Folkstone found it was too expensive to meet the NCDOT requirements, and HR did not take over the roads.
Because in the end, the choice is pretty straightforward: private roads with private control and flexibility, or public roads with public rules and regulations—but not both. And when even town leadership splits between “maybe it can be done” and “it can only be done if you meet NCDOT standards,” that’s not confusion—that’s your answer.